-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(node-core): cleanup + prep for server v2 #1561
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@archbear has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 56 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1 | |||
// |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what was your plan? would a client folder make more sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eh no pref i just moved this cause i hate utils.go as a concept and its like just a convenience func for cosmos client config
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1561 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 25.77% 25.81% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 260 259 -1
Lines 11665 11649 -16
Branches 18 18
==========================================
Hits 3007 3007
+ Misses 8491 8475 -16
Partials 167 167
|
lgtm |
No description provided.